Friday, June 14, 2013

Reposted from Victoria, Angie, Bobby, Nick and the team

Have you or a loved one been personally affected by fracking in your community?
It can be difficult to talk about the consequences of fracking. But when hundreds and thousands of people speak out together, we can't be ignored, and we can stop fracking.
Decisions are being made right now that could chart the future of fracking in thousands of communities across the country. The best way to stop fracking is to tell the real stories of people whose lives have been or will be directly impacted by this damaging practice.
Do you have a story about how fracking has impacted your life that you'd be willing to share?
Fracking ravages our land, pollutes our water and air, and makes people sick. The oil and gas industry is spreading lies, but people are rising up, getting organized, and fighting back.
Thank you.
–Victoria, Angie, Bobby, Nick, and the rest of the team

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Utica Point Pleasant Formation Well - First in Ashtabula County

The Star Beacon; Ashtabula, Ohio

June 13, 2013

First shale well to be drilled in Ashtabula County next month

By STACY MILLBERG - smillberg@starbeacon.com
Star Beacon
WAYNE TOWNSHIP — Drilling for the first shale well in Ashtabula County is set to begin late next month.

A lease agreement is in place between Texas firm, Beusa Energy, and a property owner in Wayne Township and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources issued Beusa a drilling permit on Friday.

Cary Dukes, operations manager for Beusa, said the firm will be exploring for oil and gas in the Utica-Point Pleasant formation. The first well will essentially be a test to see how it will produce. If it produces well, the firm will drill additional wells in the area, he said.

“Once we get started, the first well will determine the economic feasibility,” Dukes said.

Beusa will drill the well then complete and frack it, he said. The well will then be capped for 60 days before the firm begins to conduct flow testing.

Dukes said they will know late this year how the well will produce. Should anything hinder the drilling, such as procuring a drilling rig, Dukes said the firm will delay the drilling until spring.

“We won’t work in the snow and ice,” he said.

The Ashtabula County Energy Development Task Force met with Dukes and another member of the firm to learn more about the drilling last week. The task force was developed several months ago to prepare the county for any issues that may arise concerning fracking.

County Commissioner Joe Moroski said the task force’s main goal is to ensure that any energy development in the county is done in a safe and environmentally sound manner.

“We tried to make it clear to the people from the onset, this is not a pro-fracking group or an anti-fracking group,” he said.

The group consists of Moroski; Debbie Friedstrom, president of the Ashtabula County Township Trustees Association; Brian Anderson, executive director of Growth Partnership; Nathan Paskey, of the Soil and Water Conservation District; Sean Ratican, director of the Ashtabula County Port Authority; County Engineer Tim Martin; a representative from the county Emergency Management Agency; State Rep. John Patterson, D-Jefferson; David Marrison of the OSU Extension Office; a representative from the county Fire Chief’s Association; and State Sen. Capri Cafaro.

The group is planning to travel to Carroll County as it is actively involved in the shale oil play, Moroski said.

“Nothing gives you more first hand information than actually seeing it,” he said. “For them (Carroll County), it has been a real positive boost for pumping money into their economy.”

Moroski said he doesn’t know if Ashtabula County’s play will be as big as in some of the state’s southern counties. It will rely greatly on some of the first experiences the county has.

“It’s kind of an interesting position to be in,” he said. “We don’t know what it will be, but we know it will be something.”


 
 
 
 
 
 

Friday, February 22, 2013

VERY IMPORTANT information for those in the oil and gas exploration area

Ohio's new legacy trust is a boon to oil and gas industry, landowners

7:56 am, February 22, 2013
With the recent Marcellus and Utica shale boom, there has been a significant increase in the public concern for safety relating to drilling and fracking. While some may set aside Gasland and other portrayals as scare tactics by environmentalists, there is no doubt that fracking has potential liabilities associated with it. The website EcoWatch.org identifies a number of concerns, including:

  • handling and disposal of radioactive wastewater and sludge;

  • accidents involving transportation of radioactive/chemical waste;

  • groundwater contamination from leaking storage containers, abandoned wells and failed casings;

  • high levels of radon in natural gas from Marcellus shale;

  • respirable crystalline silica exposure of workers and nearby populations;

  • air contamination from diesel engines at drilling sites and in local communities;

  • air contamination from flaring; and

  • increased health care costs.

    There is also concern that fracking may be categorized as an abnormally dangerous activity subject to strict liability — a rather blunt and drastic legal standard. What can land owners, operators and ancillary business owners do to protect a nest egg from complex litigation?

    On Dec. 20, Gov. John Kasich signed the Ohio Legacy Trust Act, which allows an individual to put assets aside in trust to be protected from creditors. States including Alaska, Delaware and Nevada have had this kind of law for years, but Ohio is the first state in the Midwest to pass such a law.

    Ohio borrowed the best provisions from these other states and now has one of the most protective laws in the country. Beginning on March 27, 2012, residents of Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia who are involved in fracking have been protected by this new law.

    An Ohio legacy trust is an irrevocable trust and can be established by anyone, not just an Ohioan. However, there must be at least one Ohio trustee who has custody of the assets, maintains the trust records or materially participates in the management of the trust. The person establishing the trust (called a settlor) cannot be trustee. Typically the trustee would be an Ohio bank or trust company. The settlor then transfers assets to the trustee of the legacy trust and is the primary beneficiary, often with spouse and/or children as permissible beneficiaries as well.

    Under the laws of most states, if a settlor is a beneficiary of a trust she established, creditors can reach the trust assets to the extent that the settlor could benefit from the trust. However, the purpose of the legacy trust is to permit the settlor to benefit from the trust but enjoy protection from the settlor's personal creditors.

    Sound too good to be true? Well, the answer is yes and no.

    Transfers to the legacy trust (like any gift transfers) are subject to claims by a specific creditor that the transfer was “fraudulent.” A transfer to an Ohio legacy trust cannot be effective if it renders you insolvent; you cannot transfer all of your assets to a Legacy Trust and then jilt current creditors.

    There also is a statute of limitations period determining how long a creditor might have to contest such a transfer. Ohio's period is the shortest in the country, making it more difficult for class action attorneys to seize trust assets if they received a judgment. This will make Ohio an attractive place to create this type of trust.

    Ohio's statute protects transfers to legacy trusts after only 18 months from the date of transfer with respect to non pre-existing creditors. Ohio's statute protects transfers to legacy trusts after the greater of eighteen months from the date of transfer or six months from the date the creditor discovered or should have discovered the transfer to the trust with respect to preexisting creditors. Most other states, including Alaska, Delaware or Nevada, allow plaintiff/creditor's attorneys a much longer time to try to undo a transfer — from two to four years.

    The Ohio Legislature determined that it was necessary to allow certain classes of creditors to access the trust assets even though most creditors are barred (they're known as “exception creditors”). Ohio provides an exception for divorcing spouses, but only if the settlor was married to the divorcing spouse prior to the transfer to the legacy trust. Ohio also extends protection to child support orders.

    While the Ohio legacy trust is not a panacea, it will offer land owners, business owners and entrepreneurs associated with the shale boom an opportunity to protect a nest egg for a rainy day.

    In addition to the right to receive income and principal from the legacy trust, the settlor can retain other significant powers, including the right to change trustees, the right to change the distribution of the ultimate distribution of the trust, the right to manage investment of the trust assets and the right to use the trust assets.

    The rules governing the formation and administration of the legacy trust — both tax and non-tax — can be quite complex. To learn more about how a legacy trust can benefit you and your family, seek the advice of competent and qualified counsel and a qualified trust company that has experience with these types of trusts.
  • Friday, February 15, 2013

    Expansion - Is Geauga County the next Drilling Target

    CHESTER TOWNSHIP, Ohio -- Mining company Fairmount Minerals is moving its headquarters to Chester Township, after outgrowing its longtime offices in Chardon.

    The privately held company, which employs 800 people worldwide, has signed a three-year lease at a small office building off Mayfield Road. Roughly eight miles west of Fairmount's current Geauga County home, the building is part of a complex owned by the HF Group, a company that binds books and stores paper and digital records.

    Fairmount mines and processes clean, industrial-quality sand used for everything from water filtration to natural gas drilling.

    The company isn't pulling out of Chardon, where it sources sand and employs nearly 100 people at a blending operation, a technology center and other facilities. But recent hiring, and the boom in hydraulic fracturing, forced Fairmount to look for larger digs.

    "We wanted to stay in Geauga County and also get a little bit closer to the airport," said Jessi O'Reilly, an executive assistant at the headquarters. "It just happened that the location opened up, and we jumped on it."

    O'Reilly confirmed that Fairmount will move into 11,000 square feet at the HG Group complex on Thursday. Fairmount's existing headquarters, on Ravenna Road, will become back-up offices.

    The HG Group, which occupies the larger of two buildings at 8844 Mayfield Road, bought the property and the book-binding business in 1989 and built the smaller, 16,000-square-foot building 10 years later. Fairmount will share the space with another tenant but has opportunities to expand.

    "As a Geauga County businessperson and a resident, I'm also very happy that Fairmount is staying in the county," said Jay Fairfield, the HF Group's president. "They are a very civic-minded company, and they've been very, very good to Geauga County."

    Chuck Fowler, Fairmount's chief executive officer, was not available Wednesday.

    Lupo & Harrock Excavating in REAL TROUBLE

    By JAMISON COCKLIN | jcocklin@vindy.com

    YOUNGSTOWN

    Like the Mahoning River, the future of Ben W. Lupo, embattled owner of D&L Energy and Hardrock Excavating, is a bit more murky.

    Download as PDF:
    Final Analytical Report for Ohio EPA-NEDO
    Analytical report prepared by TestAmerical Laboratories, Inc. for Ohio EPA-NEDO regarding suspected water contamination by D&L Energy Group.

    Download as PDF:
    D&L Sample Results Statement
    Statement from ODNR and Ohio EPA: Sample results from D&L Oil Field Waste Brine Dumping into tributary and Mahoning River

    Download as PDF:
    US vs. Ben Lupo - Criminal Complaint
    United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio: Criminal Complaint, Case No. 4:13M 6006. United States of America v. Ben Lupo.

    Flanked by high-ranking state and federal officials, U.S. Attorney Steven M. Dettelbach announced that Lupo has been charged with one count of violating the U.S. Clean Water Act.

    State and federal regulators, along with Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine, gathered along the banks of the Mahoning River, where over the years millions have been spent to clean up the waterway, to tell a crowd of reporters, residents and activists that Lupo’s actions would not be tolerated. He eventually also will face civil charges brought by the state, DeWine said.

    In a whirlwind of activity Thursday, new details emerged about an incident Jan. 31, when regulators discovered that Lupo had instructed an employee of Hardrock Excavating to dump thousands of gallons of oil, brine water and drilling mud down a storm drain at the company’s 2761 Salt Springs Road headquarters. The waste discharged into a nearby creek and then seeped into the Mahoning River.

    In response to the early findings of a criminal investigation, an affidavit was filed in support of the federal charge, leading to an arrest warrant and Lupo’s decision to turn himself in early Thursday.

    He posted $50,000 in unsecured bond, pleaded not guilty and waived his right to a preliminary hearing, instead allowing Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert of U.S. District Court in Youngstown to turn him over to a federal grand jury, where he could face as many as 20 counts of illegal dumping and other charges.


    “This charge should serve as a warning to anyone that places their personal interests ahead of the public’s safety,” said Jim Zehringer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources director.

    “ODNR will continue to aggressively pursue and seek prosecution of any business or individual that blatantly disregards the laws we have in place to protect Ohio’s communities and natural resources.”

    Court documents make clear the uphill battle Lupo likely will face in coming months.

    According to the affidavit, based on sworn statements from David J. Barlow, a special agent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Investigation Division, one of Lupo’s employees said Lupo had instructed similar waste dumps on 20 separate occasions.

    Upon further questioning from Barlow, the employee said Lupo instructed those dumps be made after dark and “only after no one else was present at the facility.”

    The revelation is troubling, considering that regulators revealed there are 58 temporary storage tanks at 2761 Salt Springs Road, each capable of holding 20,000 gallons of drilling waste.

    After receiving an anonymous tip on Jan. 31, ODNR inspectors arrived to discover a hose connected to one of those tanks discharging into a storm drain.

    When the Ohio EPA was called the next day to examine the contents of those tanks, a “very dark, oil-like” substance, similar in appearance to motor oil, could be seen. OEPA officials detected puddles of oil throughout the length of the nearby tributary and “oil and oil sheen were visible in the Mahoning River” farther downstream, according to the affidavit.

    Court documents show Lupo’s insistence that his employees lie to investigators if asked how regularly the dumping incidents occurred — instructing them to say the violations had happened only four to six times before.

    Test results taken from samples, obtained by The Vindicator, show that several hazardous pollutants were detected in the drilling waste that spilled into the creek and river.

    Among them were benzene and toluene. Benzene is a flammable, colorless liquid that is a natural part of crude oil, gasoline and cigarette smoke. According to the American Cancer Society, studies have demonstrated the substance causes cancer.

    Toluene is water-insoluble and often found in paint thinners. Its low solubility makes it difficult for the body to expunge by sweat or bodily fluid.


    If convicted of the current charge, Dettelbach said Lupo faces up to three years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

    However, facing a grand jury means more charges could be considered for Lupo, as the jury usually meets in secret to hear arguments from a prosecutor. In that case, jurors could take into account the investigator’s findings that he instructed dumping on 20 occasions, meaning he could be indicted on separate counts.

    DeWine said federal charges were filed because the U.S. Department of Justice has the ability to charge violators under stronger federal laws. Still, he added that civil charges will be pursued.

    “It is our intention to take civil action as well. We have illegal storage, illegal transportation and illegal disposal,”

    DeWine said. “The potential fine under state law for each one of these separate violations per day is between $2,500 and $20,000. This action will be filed by the attorney general’s office on behalf of the state.”

    A separate effort is under way to shore up the state’s laws on permitting oil and gas operators and tightening regulatory oversight of the industry.

    Under state law, brine shipments are tracked with daily logs that are sent to ODNR. Asked if it was possible that Lupo was accepting more brine shipments than he could store, Richard J. Simmers, chief of ODNR’s Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management, said it was “entirely possible.” Haulers are paid by each shipment, raising the question of whether Lupo was accepting waste, dumping it and getting paid to take more.

    Simmers said regulators are working to examine the brine-hauling records of Hardrock Excavating to determine whether Lupo was profiting in any way by making repeated dumps.

    State Sen. Joe Shiavoni of Boardman, D-33rd, in cooperation with the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, the John Kasich administration and other Republican lawmakers, is working to draft legislation to increase the penalties for first-time violators and make it nearly impossible for operators to receive permits if they knowingly break the law.


    Though regulators can now issue violations, there is no law that bars transgressors from receiving future permits after incidents occur.

    Both Schiavoni and state Rep. Robert Hagan of Youngstown, D-58th, hailed Lupo’s swift prosecution, saying it sent the right message of balance between protecting the environment and pursuing economic development through the state’s emerging oil and gas industry.

    U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan of Niles, D-13th, added: “I am supportive of the federal prosecutor’s involvement, and if the alleged violations occurred, then there must be justice. We cannot allow our environment to suffer because of unlawful and immoral actions, and we must show any would-be polluters that any infractions will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

    Asked if state and federal officials were weighing any of Lupo’s other environmental infractions, stretching back to the 1970s, Dettelbach said no. But DeWine said Gov. John Kasich has requested that those infractions be examined closely.

    At this point, Dettelbach added, Lupo’s other companies — about 20 of them — are not subject to this investigation. He offered few details but said those operations could eventually get a second look if investigators deem it necessary.

    Furthermore, where the drilling waste was coming from still remains unclear, as regulators continue to examine records. Officials on Thursday could say only that the waste was coming from “active drilling sites in Pennsylvania and Ohio.”

    Last week, in an unprecedented move, all of D&L Energy’s permits were revoked, idling its injection wells. At the same time, regulators revoked Hardrock Excavating’s permit to haul brine water.

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

    Well To Be Fracked Within Mile of Nuclear Plant

    By CASEY JUNKINS - Staff Writer , The Intelligencer / Wheeling News-Register


    SHIPPINGPORT, Pa. - Despite concerns associated with nearby seismic activity, officials do not foresee any problems with Chesapeake Energy's plans to frack within 1 mile of the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station.
    "We would not have granted the permit if we did not think it was safe. Considering the depth at which they are drilling, there should not be any problem," said John Poister, spokesman for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. "They will be working at a depth at least 1 mile underground, so this should not create a problem."
    The nuclear plant - operated by FirstEnergy Corp. - is located in Pennsylvania along the Ohio River, roughly 10 miles east of East Liverpool and Chester along the Ohio River. According to company information, nuclear power has been generated at the site since 1957.

    Article Photos

    Photo by Casey Junkins
    As Chesapeake Energy continues drilling and fracking gas wells in Ohio County, the company is preparing to break ground within a mile of the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant in Shippingport, Pa.
    Chesapeake works across West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Company employees, or subcontractors working on Chesapeake's behalf, drill and frack wells all the time.
    Stacey Brodak, senior director of corporate development for Chesapeake, directed all questions to DEP and FirstEnergy officials, noting Pennsylvania regulators "have a rigorous regulatory review process for all permitting."
    "While we do not expect any impact from an oil and gas production well near the Beaver Valley station, our robustly designed and constructed facilities are built to withstand a wide variety of issues with considerable margin, including potential seismic events, which is the concern often cited with hydraulic fracturing," said FirstEnergy spokeswoman Jennifer Young.
    Pennsylvania is home to the worst accident in the history of U.S. commercial nuclear power. On March 28, 1979, a partial meltdown at the Three Mile Island plant - caused by a sequence of equipment malfunctions, design-related problems and worker errors - released small amounts of radioactive gases and radioactive iodine.
    Although fracking - which pumps millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals into the earth at high pressure to break shale rock - has not been proven to cause earthquakes, there are some potential links. After a swarm of small earthquakes hit north-central Arkansas near a formation called the Fayetteville Shale last year, the state issued a temporary moratorium last year on new injection wells. The state found that three wells were operating near an unknown fault and were likely contributing to earthquakes. State officials shut those wells and banned future ones near the fault.
    In April 2010, a 3.4 magnitude earthquake hit Braxton County, W.Va. In a span of several months, the area was hit by five more such quakes. The quakes were small - about a 2.7 magnitude - but large enough to catch the attention of state officials. Some speculated these quakes might be related to nearby fracking, but West Virginia University geology professor Tim Carr said he believed they occurred naturally.
    According to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, an earthquake would cause nuclear power plant structures on or in the ground to move. The nature of the movement depends on how the earthquake releases energy and location. The intensity of an earthquake can be characterized by both the frequency of the shaking and by the acceleration of the ground at the plant.
    Furthermore, Ohio Department of Natural Resources officials said that the injection of gas-drilling wastewater into a brine disposal well near Youngstown almost certainly induced a dozen small earthquakes last year.

    Tuesday, October 30, 2012

    Hydraulic Fracturing has a long way to go -

    By Robert Campbell

    NEW YORK Oct 26 (Reuters) - For all the hoopla surrounding the shale revolution in oil and gas markets, it is worth bearing in mind that the technology is still in its infancy.

    It is hard not to be overwhelmed by the speed of the transformation hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is bringing to global oil and gas markets.

    In the United States, fracking has spawned talk of re-industrialization, buoyed by cheap natural gas that will give North America a competitive edge over the rest of the world.

    And shale oil production may lift U.S. crude output so quickly that the country becomes once again the world's largest producer of liquids within a decade.

    Yet current techniques are in their infancy according to industry experts. There is considerable room for improvement, both in the application of force to reservoirs as well as in the location of "sweet spots" where fracking yields the best results.

    Today hydraulic fracturing relies heavily on brute force and operators still count on a great deal of luck when completing wells, although the best operators are gaining an edge through research and development.

    However, the scale of the opportunity from improvement is staggering.

    Analysts at Bernstein Research argued this week, based on data from services firm Schlumberger, that a remarkable 80 percent of production from average shale wells comes from only a fifth of the fracking stages, and a staggering 50 percent of all fracking stages contribute no output whatsoever.

    That suggests a huge amount of money spent blasting water and sand into the ground is being wasted. And that in turn points to a major focus of research in the oil services industry: improving completions to cut costs.

    Lower costs may well open up additional shale basins for exploitation where the economic case today is simply not compelling.



    PRIMITIVE WELLS

    Already, modest reductions in costs and drilling time have allowed some operators in shale areas to substantially boost productivity.

    Continental Resources, one of the top firms in North Dakota's Bakken Shale, trumpeted the role of technology and refined techniques in helping it achieve its 2014 production goal this year.

    Higher production gives the firm more cash flow, which, in the custom of North American independent oil firms, it is plowing right back into exploration and development.

    This is a major reason why shale-related output in North America has continued to outstrip projections. Lower costs lead to higher cash flows, which in turn lead to even more drilling than initially planned.

    None of this is to say there are not significant challenges nor that some firms are hopelessly optimistic in their forecasts. But the current scope for technological improvement appears to remain considerable.

    The prospect for technological advances in shale oil and gas extraction is one of the major reasons why some opponents of peak oil theories, like Nansen Saleri, a former Saudi Aramco executive who now heads upstream technology consultancy Quantum Reservoir Impact, are optimistic about the prospect for liquid fuels production.

    "In a few years the techniques used today for fracking will be viewed as primitive," Saleri said in an interview this summer.

    Finding the technologies that help streamline completion costs for hydraulically fractured wells as well as improving monitoring techniques to ensure wells and frack stages are better placed are the focus on intense research already.

    Longer term, companies are already examining more radical improves, such as replacing pumped water with magnetic resonance techniques or other energy sources, in the fracking process.

    Moreover as the technology matures and becomes less costly, it is likely to prove more portable than at present.

    While North America seems uniquely suited to shale oil exploration at present due to deep capital markets and an oil and gas industry made up mostly of smaller, independent firms, lower cost technology may eventually erode this advantage.

    That is the interesting question for global oil markets. If shale oil drilling techniques can be exported, will the balance of power shift? Or will the fact that major oil basins remain largely off-limits to private companies blunt the impact.