Thursday, September 6, 2012

Broadview Heights residents will have a chance in November to say whether they want more oil and gas wells in their city.

Tish O'Dell, stands near a well, left, and storage tanks, right, common sights in Broadview Heights. Tish helped collect more than 1,700 signatures to place an anti-drilling charter amendment on the November ballot.


Broadview Heights residents will have a chance in November to say whether they want more oil and gas wells in their city.

But even if they oppose new drilling, it's not clear whether they can actually prevent it from happening.

Council members voted unanimously Tuesday night to place an amendment on the ballot that would prohibit new wells in the southern Cuyahoga County bedroom community. The city currently has about 90 wells scattered throughout 13 square miles, most of them sunk in the last five years.

"Based on going door to door, I think people here think it's enough," said Tish O'Dell, who helped organize the drive to collect signatures in support of an anti-drilling ballot initiative.

"This is a victory for the rights of the local community over state pre-emptive law, which strips citizens of local self-governing rights," she said.

O'Dell, co-founder of the grassroots Mothers Against Drilling in Our Neighborhoods, said using a charter amendment instead of a city ordinance to outlaw new oil and gas operations is aimed at trumping a 2004 state law that gave the Ohio Department of Natural Resources authority for all decisions about drilling.

"We are seeing more of these local resolutions," ODNR spokeswoman Heidi Hetzel-Evans said. "We do have sole authority for regulating all aspects of the oil and gas industry in Ohio and we will continue to uphold the law."

Broadview Heights Law Director Vince Ruffa advised council members to oppose putting the amendment before voters.

"As much as I would love to say we can control it, we can't," he said. Ruffa predicted the amendment will be unenforceable if adopted "And if we try to enforce it, I would assume that we will get sued by the people who want to drill."

Councilman George Stelmaschuk said the measure might send a message even if it doesn't withstand legal scrutiny.

"I hope at least it will provide some kind of deterrent," he said. "Maybe some of these oil companies will see that we don't want these wells, and maybe residents . . .won't sign leases."

Supporters of a ban collected over 1,700 signatures in July and August backing a ballot vote.
Dubbed a "Community Bill of Rights," the measure says that Broadview Heights residents have the right to clean air, clean water, clean soil and a sustainable energy future. It also prohibits new drilling or using new methods such as horizontal fracking to extract gas and oil from existing wells.

Other communities in Ohio, including Mansfield, also are trying to block drilling operations by arguing that the home-rule provision of the Ohio Constitution supercedes the authority of the ODNR.
O'Dell said her group worked closely with the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, out of Pennsylvania, to craft the bill-of-rights charter change.

"Our motive is strictly based on, we care about the community and the people in the community," she said.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Ohio already has nearly 35,000 wells to monitor, the report found.

Taxing issues
In the area of taxes, however, the report seems to indicate that drillers are getting a very good deal in Ohio, which currently taxes the production of gas at 2.5 cents per thousand cubic feet (mcf) of gas produced, or about 1% of the gas' market value. That's much less than the 18.45 cents per mcf, or 7.5%, that Texas charges with its severance tax, or the 17.2 cents per mcf (7%) that Oklahoma charges, the report found. The study used a price point of $2.46 per mcf in order to convert absolute taxes to percentages.

Drillers, who are fighting Ohio Gov. John Kasich's ongoing efforts to increase severance taxes in Ohio, have argued that a tax increase would have a chilling effect on drilling in the state, pushing companies to move their rigs to other states.

However, the report shows that some states with the highest severance taxes also have the highest number of wells drilled.

Texas has among the highest overall tax rates on oil and gas production but leads the nation with more than 95,000 total gas wells and twice the shale gas production of any other state. But Texas is a very large state in terms of its land area. But even relatively small West Virginia, with a tax rate of 12.3 cents per mcf, or about 5% of the total proceeds from the sale of its gas, has more than 52,000 gas wells, all of them old-style conventional wells, data in the report show.

Oklahoma, similar in size to Ohio and with taxes about seven times higher, still has 44,000 gas wells and is the third-largest producing state in terms of shale gas, the report finds.

Data like that might be helpful to state legislators as they try to decide whether to back their governor's tax request. But both Mr. Richardson and Tom Stewart, executive vice president of the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, warned that comparing how states tax gas drilling isn't always as simple as just comparing rates.

“There may be a lower tax on initial production in some states (such as Texas),” Mr. Richardson said. “The problem with that is, on shale gas wells, that's a substantial part of your tax revenues.”

He said that's because shale gas wells tend to produce more gas per day initially, right after they are drilled and production has begun, than they do months or even days and weeks afterward.
Scratching the surface
Mr. Stewart said he's looked at several other states that, on the surface, have higher taxes than Ohio — and found that there are mitigating circumstances in many of those states that result in taxes that are effectively lower, especially for horizontal drilling of shale gas wells that produce gas only after they are fracked, like the wells in Ohio. Texas, for example, charges its base tax rate on drillers accessing conventional deposits of oil and gas, but discounts the rate significantly for high-cost shale gas, he said.

Other states have similar mitigating circumstances, Mr. Stewart said. For example, Michigan has a tax rate of 5%, which is about five times higher than Ohio.

“But, what we don't often read is that a producer paying that 5% in Michigan gets to offset that against his normal state business taxes. ... So it's a fair deal,” Mr. Stewart said.

Other states should not be used as examples, because their tax strategies aren't working, he said.

“Arkansas put in a severance tax in 2008, gave a small abatement period of a couple of years — and ever since then, the drilling rate has dropped by as much as 50%,” Mr. Stewart said.

“And West Virginia? I'm not sure why anyone in Ohio public policy would want to mimic the state of West Virginia,” he said, noting that drillers are ignoring parts of West Virginia, while drilling in nearby Pennsylvania is going strong.

Pennsylvania charges drillers an impact fee to compensate local governments for wear and tear on their infrastructure but has no severance tax, he said. “That really hasn't worked out for the great state of West Virginia,” Mr. Stewart said.

Mr. Stewart said he's fine with Ohio's regulations. Indeed, he contends, they are the result of about a century of drilling in Ohio and represent challenges that were met along the way with new laws that often were supported by the oil and gas industry.

But higher taxes are something the industry remains dead set against, he said. A tax of just a few percentage points on a drillers' gross receipts could end up being a tax on as much as half of their profits, because margins are tight, Mr. Stewart said.

“And anyone who believes that taking half of the net profits won't have an impact on the drilling rate is nuts,” he said.

By DAN SHINGLE
Partial Article CCB
4:30 am, September 4, 2012

Companies new, old jockey for position in Ohio's rapidly developing Utica play

 
For the past few months, there's been much speculation on what would become of the 337,000 acres that Chesapeake Energy put up for sale as part of an effort to pay off a mountain of debt that the company ran up to — among other things — buy the mineral rights on those lands. But while that's the single biggest bundle of mineral rights likely to change hands in Ohio's Utica shale gas play, it's not the only one. Companies and investors alike still are jockeying for positions to profit from the Utica's apparently vast deposits of natural gas, crude oil and liquids used in the petrochemical industry — and some observers say we've yet to see all of the energy companies that will eventually emerge to drill in Ohio. “We are seeing new names pop up, smaller companies with names we've never heard of,” said Mark Dolezal, president of the Eastern Geauga Landowners, a group of about 300 landowners in Geauga County that has put together 17,000 acres for which it hopes to sell mineral rights.

Indeed, new players not only are entering the Ohio Utica, but are being formed to do so. Texas-based Beland Energy Utica LLC, for one, was created in May by Beusa Energy principals, who have had success drilling for shale gas in the Haynesville shale play, which includes parts of Arkansas, Louisiana and East Texas, said Gregory Brown, the general counsel for both Beland and Beusa. They hope to repeat their success in the Utica, he said.

“The Utica is an interesting area and an interesting play and people go where opportunities are,” Mr. Brown said. “And lots of people see potential in the Utica.”

Mr. Brown declined to say how much capital Beusa, a privately held company, has to spend on Utica leases or for drilling here, but said the company would like to initially acquire the mineral rights to 15,000 to 20,000 acres here. If those acres prove profitable, it likely will try to buy more, he said.

That's not going to be a cheap ticket in at this point. Mineral rights in the Utica have skyrocketed in price in the last two years, and currently fetch between $2,000 and $5,000 per acre.

Even at the low end of that price range, the mineral rights alone on 15,000 acres would cost $30 million — which does not include the roughly $6 million to $10 million that Utica drillers say they currently are spending to drill each new well.

A 15,000-acre parcel could support about 23 well pads, at 640 acres per pad, with each pad containing as many as six wells, drillers say.


By DAN SHINGLER
4:30 am, September 4, 2012

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Uphill battle agains brine injection in Niles/Weathersfield

August 24, 2012

By DAN POMPILI -

NILES - Niles city and Weathersfield Township could face an uphill battle in their opposition to the proposed drilling of brine injection wells in the city and township.

Niles City Council passed a resolution Wednesday banning injection well activity within city limits, a follow-up to Weathersfield's earlier action. Mayor Ralph Infante also sent a letter Thursday to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management opposing the well permits applied for by American Water Management Services Co.
"The uncertainty of waste water and potential problems it may cause are worrisome to our communities," the letter reads.

The letter states that one of the wells would be along Route 169 next to Niles Commerce Park in northern Weathersfield Township and would be located within five blocks of the city's downtown area. Infante also is concerned that the brine will have to be transported through the city to get it to the injection well site.

Injection wells are used to store liquid byproducts from the extraction of natural gas from underground shale deposits.

According to a legal notice published in the Tribune Chronicle, the wells in question will be drilled at depths of anywhere from 4,450 feet to 9,100 feet and one will accept on average 2,200 barrels of salt water waste per day, while the other would take an average of 1,000 barrels daily.

Weathersfield trustee Steve Gerberry said Wednesday night that Niles' opposition to the wells would have "more teeth," but conceded that ODNR's denial of the well permit applications would be a first.
Heidi Hetzel-Evans, spokeswoman for ODNR's Division of Oil and Gas, said there is no difference between a city and township opposing a well. She said the permits haven't come up for consideration yet, but ODNR will deny an application if the opposing community can provide convincing evidence that health, safety or an environmental resource would be directly threatened by a well.
No permits have been approved since the state placed a moratorium new injection wells following a 4.0-magnitude earthquake in Youngstown on New Year's Eve.

Since then, changes have begun to be implemented to both the review and testing process.
The review period was extended from 45 to 60 days up to 45 to 90 days. Also, the state is now permitted to request pressure testing, geological investigations, seismic testing, and radiological testing on newly drilled wells, as well at submittal of a plan for monitoring seismic activity.
"Even after drilling the well, if we are not assured of the progress with health and safety testing, we can still shut down the well," Hetzel-Evans said. "This is a highly scrutinized and monitored program."

She added that the new laws also increased the time that public notices must run in newspapers, from one day to five consecutive days at a minimum, and that communities now have two weeks to voice their opposition and request a hearing.
Based on the state's criteria, and Gerberry said he's unsure if the city and his township can meet that burden.

"We can oppose it all we want, it's going to be very difficult to listen to or grant our opposition on those terms," he said.

The ODNR'S Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review will vote next month on whether to make the emergency rules permanent

Compressed natural gas market on the rise

Shares of Chesapeake Energy have rebounded sharply since the news in mid-May that CEO Aubrey McClendon had been mixing business with personal investments.

But even with a more than 50% jump from the lows of three months ago, the stock may still have some more room to run. Why? Just look at the pump the next time you refill your car. The price of gasoline has suddenly crept higher. And with prices getting close to $4 a gallon, conversations about gas alternatives are again making the rounds.

This should help Chesapeake (CHK, Fortune 500), which has a growing presence in compressed natural gas, a type of fuel that is expected to be used more by consumers. Chesapeake formed a relationship with General Electric (GE, Fortune 500) in March to work on more natural gas solutions in the transportation industry.

The Department of Energy is increasingly giving larger amounts of funding to organizations in major cities that support lowering emissions—something compress natural gas can deliver.

And since this type of gas costs roughly half the price for regular gas at the pump -- prospects for this fuel source seem bright. Currently, Honda (HMC) is the only major automaker that manufactures light-duty vehicles running on compressed natural gas in the US. But it may soon have more competition.

Mick Cornett, mayor of Oklahoma City, has publicly endorsed the use of compress natural gas lately. So Chesapeake, which is based in Oklahoma City, may be in the enviable position of having home-team advantage in the state as new planning and permitting go into effect.

Gaining local contracts and proving compressed natural gas is a real business will only validate it as a fuel source that this country clearly needs to offset dependence on foreign oil while also reducing emissions. This may be why 22 states are joining forces to solicit American carmakers to build compressed natural gas-powered vehicles for state fleets.

Cleveland Crains

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Hilcorp Gets First Drilling Permit for Columbiana



YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio – The Ohio Department of Natural Resources has issued a new horizontal drilling permit to Houston-based Hilcorp Energy Co. to begin oil and gas exploration in Columbiana County.

Hilcorp, a privately owned oil and gas exploration company, was issued a permit Aug. 13 to drill on the Hanover-Mountz property in Hanover Township, records show. It is the 49th well permitted in Columbiana County since 2011, and is the first such well for Hilcorp in the county.
Hilcorp recently signed an $836,000 drilling lease with the city of Campbell; the company has approached the city of Struthers and the Lowellville school board about leasing mineral rights for the lands both entities own.

According to ODNR records, two Columbiana wells – the Sanor well in Knox Township and the Ayrview Acres well in West Township – are in production. No results have been resulted.
Chesapeake Exploration LLC, the most active energy company drilling in the Utica shale, last week was issued two permits to drill horizontal wells in Carroll County, ODNR records show.
Since 2011, Chesapeake has been issued 121 permits to drill in Carroll County, which has emerged as the focal point of Utica shale development.

No permits were issued last week for Mahoning and Trumbull counties, nor were any issued for Mercer and Lawrence counties in western Pennsylvania.

Copyright 2012 The Business Journal, Youngstown, Ohio.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Storage Field area and your Mineral Rights - A must read



YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio -- Natural gas storage fields beneath tens of thousands of acres in Ohio have become the flash point of the latest legal battle over drilling rights across the state.

At issue is whether landowners within these fields own the deep drilling rights to their land, an especially sensitive issue since major energy companies are stepping up oil and gas exploration in the Utica shale and paying generous bonuses and royalties to residents.

"It's going on all over the state," says Dale Arnold, director of energy policy for the Ohio Farm Bureau. "This issue comes up in every storage field in Ohio."

Natural gas storage fields came into prominence shortly after World War II, Arnold says. These fields are areas of the Clinton sandstone strata between 3,000 and 6,000 feet below the earth where energy companies once drilled, some as far back as the 1930s. Once a particular region of the sandstone was drilled dry, these companies converted the acreage into storage areas connected to major pipeline networks that pump natural gas to and from the underground fields.

Ohio is home to 16 such storage fields.


The premise is for natural gas companies to keep a reserve for the winter months where it can be tapped when demand increases. "There's an injection season and a withdrawal season," Arnold says.
Natural gas is purchased and transported into the storage fields between April 1 and Oct. 31 each year, Arnold explains. That reserve is then drawn down between November and March, demand being highest during the colder months. "They're designed to address at least three to four cold snaps or adverse winter climate," he says.
The main legal question before courts in northeastern Ohio is whether those who own land within a designated storage field also own the mineral rights, Arnold says.
During the 1940s and ‘50s, energy companies negotiated many leases with landowners that specifically awarded these companies the rights to storage, Arnold says. However, drilling companies exploring the Clinton formation would often cut into the storage field and extract gas from the reserve.
After that, the language in these leases was changed to include not only storage rights, but also mineral and production rights of any potential drilling on or even near the land, Arnold notes. "They wanted to protect the storage field," he says. "Depending on how your lease is worded, it could mean any new gas coming out underneath the field," such as gas drilled from the Utica shale.
Fast forward to today. It's these leases that are complicating matters for thousands of landowners as an entirely new phase of development and billions of dollars of investment from the oil and gas industry take root in eastern Ohio.
Today, two of these storage fields – the Brinker Storage Field in Columbiana County owned by Columbia Gas, and the North Canton Storage Field owned by Dominion – are the subject of a legal fight over these leases.
Landowners outside these storage fields have signed lucrative land deals with energy giants such as Chesapeake Energy Corp. – some of them commanding bonuses of $5,800 an acre and 20% royalties. But many of those within the field are being held to these decades-old leases that at most award them $200 a year for their rights to any gas produced and a 12.5% royalty on any oil found. Moreover, Columbia Gas interprets the leases to mean that royalties could be collected only if the well sits on that property.
"Some of these leases are worse than others, but they're all bad," says Jill McNicol of Leetonia, who lives in the Brinker field. "There is no protection for your property, and they can use your water without compensation. There's nothing good about these leases."
The Brinker Storage Field is one of the smaller fields in Ohio, encompassing 25,000 to 30,000 acres, she says. Her repeated attempts to obtain a map of the field were denied by both Columbia and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, she relates. They cited “proprietary issues” as the reason for their denials.
McNicol and her husband, Patrick, along with five other parties, have sued Columbia Gas Transmission LLC in the Columbiana Court of Common Pleas, arguing that the company breached the terms of these leases years ago and that these leases should be rescinded or reformed.
"We have 65 acres," she says. "They say they want to live by the terms of the lease, but they haven't. I know of a lot who haven't received a penny."
Since the lawsuit was filed May 30, NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage, parent of Columbia Gas, announced a partnership with Houston-based Hillcorp Energy Corp. that calls for the construction of a $300 million processing and pipeline network in eastern Ohio.
McNicol says others toward the center of the storage area were afforded the opportunity to modify their leases during the 1980s and 1990s, but those who lived on the outer edges – such as McNicol – were not. "Those people were able to sign leases, and they're valid," she says.
However, McNicol points out, landowners with the modified leases aren't likely to have wells drilled on their properties because much of the surrounding land is leased under the older agreements. These older agreements, she says, contain language that prohibits their land from becoming part of a larger drilling unit – in some cases spanning between 300 and 600 acres.
McNicol and others are also voicing their support for a bill sponsored by state Rep. Mark Okey, D-Carrollton, that would provide minimum royalty payments of 15% to landowners.
Meantime, other landowners have filed a class action suit in Stark County that involves drilling rights in the North Canton Storage field, owned by Dominion Gas. The North Canton field extends from the east side of Wayne County into Stark County and involves as much as 60,000 acres.
"There are thousands and thousands of landowners who are affected, including the [Akron-Canton] airport," says attorney Robert Tscholl, who is representing landowners.
Tscholl says that Stark County holds the potential of becoming the heart of the Utica's oil play, and the North Canton field could be a major contributor. "This could drive the economy in Ohio for who knows how long," he suggests.
Jim Mathews, another attorney representing landowners in the dispute, says that Dominion never intended to drill in the field and used the land only for storage. "All Dominion ever wished to hold was the Clinton level for storage interests,” he says. “They had no obligation to explore.”
The lawyers argue that the deep rights and storage rights are severable, and that maintaining the storage rights does not bind them to production rights. And, they contend. since Dominion has not adhered to the terms of these leases, they should be considered expired.
Mathews also notes that similar cases arose in Pennsylvania as oil and gas exploration in the Marcellus shale accelerated. “We’ve found some cases that support our position,” where a court sided with landowners. The court ruled that the company had consideration for storage rights, but not drilling and production rights.
Alan Wenger, an attorney with Harrington, Hoppe and Mitchell in Youngstown, says that he's been dealing with landowners in the Brinker field since energy companies first began canvassing Ohio more than two years ago. Wenger has not filed a lawsuit on behalf of his clients.
"There was a lack of contemplating anything that's happening right now," Wenger says. Thus far, he knows of no drilling activity in the Brinker field, although some leases have been signed. He foresees a settlement on some level with these landowners in the near future as the appetite for drilling increases.
"I think that with or without the lawsuits, there will be some resolution," Wenger says. "We've argued many times with Columbia, and I believe the companies will come around to some sort of accommodation."